| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. [Summit] State of Balance - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
The link nerf is upon is, and it has turned out to not actually be a nerf. When is the real one?
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2013.08.26 00:36:00
|
2. Balancing: Caldari Hybrid Shield vs. Amarr Laser Armor - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
More ******** buffer tanks are not what the game needs. Also I'm pretty sure you overlooked a few things.
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.25 08:45:00
|
3. New nebulas, ruined potential - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Erm. How about making higher resolution backgrounds optional, just like high anti aliasing, resolution, effects, etc.?
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.23 09:25:00
|
4. Drug Booster Balancing issues - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm pretty sure there were some planned booster changes specifically for low sec, to make it more interesting (like making it so you can only trade them there?), but I see that isn't the case anymore, or I just imagined it. Also, I disapprove of ...
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.23 09:19:00
|
5. I want your little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sentry guns in low sec kill drones. They should shoot the owner instead if possible. This is why I never fly gallente, it sucks.
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.16 22:29:00
|
6. T2 warfare links - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Moonaura wrote: If you are worried that command ships are cramping your *ahem* pro solo one-vs-one PvP, you're doing one-vs-one PvP in the wrong place or against the wrong people, people who have to many accounts and to much ISK to make it wor...
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.16 02:46:00
|
7. T2 warfare links - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Why are CCP making these? I know the difference isn't really a big deal, but they should be nerfing warfare links if anything, except info (not to mention all the other things they should do, like give these links a range of 100km or something and...
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.16 01:43:00
|
8. Winter 2011 expansion now on Sisi - leave your feedback here - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
ilmon wrote: we know AF would come after the expansion but before a new expansion but please tell me there will be a change to FW... Where were we told that?
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.14 18:12:00
|
9. Winter 2011 expansion now on Sisi - leave your feedback here - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
>all the features set for Winter 2011 So there will be no changes for assault ships, ewar drones, faction warfare, naga, minmatar, further nerfs for angel ships or any pirate love?
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.14 17:43:00
|
10. The destroyer buff - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Still having difficulty finding a reason to fly any of them except the thrasher. Cormorant is massively improved, but the thrasher is still better most of the time. Others I'm not even going to bother with. I require 3-4 mids, not 1 or 2. I think ...
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.14 15:54:00
|
11. WHile you are at it, Please REMOVE Sensor booster LIghtshow - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's useful to be able to see if someone is sensor boosting. It's just way too big though. There was a time when they had the current effect, but it didn't go all over the screen when you zoomed out, it was much smaller. Also the older one with th...
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.11.14 15:51:00
|
12. Ship Balancing: Dramiel! (and Logistics) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Also making it so assisting a ship that cannot dock/jump makes you unable to dock/jump.
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.07.18 17:13:00
|
13. Ship Balancing: Dramiel! (and Logistics) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I was expecting CCP to be removing the infinite cap thing from guardian/oneiros and fixing the tiny sig radius they all have (also maybe making it so pirates can actually use between 0 and 2 of them at a time). Instead I see everyone just wants th...
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2011.07.18 17:11:00
|
14. New Dev Blog: Team Best Friends Forever: What's Happening Winter 2010? - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sleeper AI? So instant drone death and ridiculous tackle range? How about something that emulates pvp instead of just being really obnoxious.
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2010.09.24 12:20:00
|
15. Phantasm - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Oh hey my thread is still here. Yeah, it could also do with more capacitor. It can't run beams and a shield tank with this little. Also there's nothing you can actually use the highslots for when not in web range (which you shouldn't be).
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2010.03.10 20:28:00
|
16. Phantasm - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Oh, it's my thread. Anyway, I think I'll just get a vagabond instead, since it's superior in every way.
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2010.01.08 20:20:00
|
17. Phantasm - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Does anyone else find this ship somewhat underwhelming in dominion? Compared to the other faction cruisers, that is. I can't tank it up sufficiently to go short range while having enough mids to be useful, and beams setups seem pretty bad compared...
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2009.12.27 05:12:00
|
18. What are the chances of Gallente being fixed in Dominion 1.1? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I really shouldn't be posting in a whine thread. Anyway, something that hasn't been mentioned yet: drone ships with 75 bandwidth. It's so inconvenient. How about 50 bandwidth on the vexor and a larger drone bonus, and 100 or 125 bandwidth on the m...
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2009.12.26 00:38:00
|
19. Boost Patch (Domination 1.2?) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I really think it would be better to just remove t2 ammo altogether. Also you didn't mention T1 cruisers and loads of other stuff.
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2009.12.23 02:40:00
|
20. FW MISSION NERF INCOMING! - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
This is not the missions forum.
- by Roffle Roffle - at 2009.11.25 00:09:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |